Personal tools
You are here: Home ACE Encyclopaedia Topic Areas Electoral Management EMB Composition and Roles EMB Membership EMB Members: Respected Experts or Watchdogs on Each Other? Advantages and Disadvantages of Multiparty, Expert, and Combined EMBs
Navigation
 

Advantages and Disadvantages of Multiparty, Expert, and Combined EMBs

Multiparty (partisan) EMB

Advantages

  • May promote election participation by opposing political forces
  • May encourage voter participation
  • Enhances electoral transparency
  • Ensures political party input to EMB’s policy development
  • Ensures links with critical electoral stakeholders
  • Brings political experience to the management of electoral processes

Disadvantages

  • Members' actions may be motivated by political interest
  • May not have appropriate professional experience or qualifications
  • May be unwieldy if all parties are represented
  • May lack credibility if some parties are excluded or if political parties are not respected
  • May find consensus decision making difficult
  • EMB unity may suffer due to public disputes between parties
  • EMB stability can be undermined by political parties replacing their representatives frequently

Expert (non-partisan) EMB

Advantages

  • Impartial and neutral membership promotes credibility of EMB
  • Likely to reject political pressure
  • Professionalism of members
  • Makes a range of expert knowledge available on the EMB
  • Eminent public figure members raise profile of EMB
  • May have a broad range of professional networks on which EMB can draw

Disadvantages

  • May not be politically sensitive
  • Actions may not be transparent to political actors
  • May not have good links with critical electoral stakeholders
  • Members may be regarded as traitors to ideals by civil society
  • The best ‘experts’ may not be willing to serve
  • May be difficult to find ‘non-partisan’ members in transitional environments

Combined EMBs

Advantages

  • May achieve balance between political and technical considerations
  • May encourage participation and expert members
  • Expert members may counterbalance any attempt at partisan actions
  • EMB transparent to political participants and has some professional credibility
  • Both expert knowledge and political input available to EMB
  • Links with both critical electoral stakeholders and public figures
  • Has both political experience and professional networking capacities

Disadvantages

  • Political and expert elements may have different agendas
  • EMB may experience competitive leaking of information between its components
  • May be unwieldy if all political and expert elements are represented
  • May lack credibility if some parties are excluded
  • May find consensus decision making difficult
  • High calibre experts may not be willing to work with political elements

Document Actions