Some Key Advantages and Disadvantages of International Donor Funding for Electoral Processes
Advantages
- May be necessary to ensure an electoral event is held.
- Donor funded technical assistance can raise electoral administration standards.
- Assistance with implementing international standards can enhance the freedom and fairness of electoral processes.
- Skills transfer from technical assistance can create sustainable improvements in electoral processes.
- Coordinated donor assistance can plug critical gaps in the EMB’s budget.
- Funding may assist the EMB to improve its service and credibility by acquiring appropriate technology.
- May encourage EMBs to improve their budgeting and accounting processes.
Disadvantages
- May create dependence on foreign funding of electoral processes.
- May lead to introduction of costly and unsustainable electoral practices.
- Unless carefully coordinated, can lead to duplication of funding.
- May concentrate on high profile activities to the detriment of essential ones.
- May not ensure sufficient funding is received in time.
- Ineffective or inappropriate externally driven technical solutions may be imposed on the EMB.
- May be difficult to implement different accounting mechanisms from multiple donors.
