Personal tools
You are here: Home ACE Encyclopaedia Topic Areas Electoral Management Financial Management of EMBs Who Finances EMBs and How? Donor Funding Some Key Advantages and Disadvantages of International Donor Funding for Electoral Processes

Some Key Advantages and Disadvantages of International Donor Funding for Electoral Processes

Advantages

  • May be necessary to ensure an electoral event is held.
  • Donor funded technical assistance can raise electoral administration standards.
  • Assistance with implementing international standards can enhance the freedom and fairness of electoral processes.
  • Skills transfer from technical assistance can create sustainable improvements in electoral processes.
  • Coordinated donor assistance can plug critical gaps in the EMB’s budget.
  • Funding may assist the EMB to improve its service and credibility by acquiring appropriate technology.
  • May encourage EMBs to improve their budgeting and accounting processes.

Disadvantages

  • May create dependence on foreign funding of electoral processes.
  • May lead to introduction of costly and unsustainable electoral practices.
  • Unless carefully coordinated, can lead to duplication of funding.
  • May concentrate on high profile activities to the detriment of essential ones.
  • May not ensure sufficient funding is received in time.
  • Ineffective or inappropriate externally driven technical solutions may be imposed on the EMB.
  • May be difficult to implement different accounting mechanisms from multiple donors.

Document Actions