Herramientas Personales
Usted está aquí: Inicio ACE 1.0 Administration and Cost of Elections Project Electoral Systems Block Vote - Disadvantages


Find us on Facebook   Follow us on Twitter   RSS News Feed   ACE YouTube Channel

 
Left arrow anterior Tabla de contenido siguiente Right arrow
Your are currently reading the archived ACE Encyclopaedia Version 1.0
The new, significantly extended and updated ACE Encyclopaedia is Version 2.0.
Access Electoral Systems in ACE 2.0

Block Vote - Disadvantages

Under the Block Vote, when voters cast all their votes for the candidates of a single party, which is often the case, the system tends to exaggerate all the disadvantages of FPTP, in particular its disproportionality. In Mauritius in 1982 and 1995, for example, the former opposition won every seat in the legislature with only sixty-four and sixty-five percent of the vote, respectively. This created severe difficulties for the effective functioning of a parliamentary system based on concepts of government and opposition.

A critical flaw of the Party Block is the production of 'super-majoritarian' results, where one party can win almost all of the seats with a simple majority of the votes. In the Singaporean elections of 1991, for example, a sixty-one percent vote for the ruling People's Action Party gave it ninety-five percent of all seats in parliament.

Acciones de Documento