Recommendations —
English
 

Election Observation Portal - Recommendations Database

Country

Year

Topic

Organization

Recommendation status


Keywords (full text search)




67 recommendations
Recommendation recommendation for future referendum 1 (pg 73-74) (Electoral Management) Venezuela 2004
by: The Carter Center

Decide that signature collection is controlled by either a) parties with stricter verification controls to assess signer identity/will, or b) the National Election Commission (CNE) with stricter controls during signature collection


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation recommendation for future referendum 2 (pg 73-74) (Electoral Management) Venezuela 2004
by: The Carter Center

The CNE should conduct an internal evaluation of the administration of the recall referendum process, make recommendations for legislation to ensure a transparent and swift process, respecting the intent of citizen petitioners as well as the rights of the potentially recalled official; protect individual privacy during verification and, as much as possible, signature collection


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation recommendation for future referendum 3 (pg 73-74) (Electoral Management) Venezuela 2004
by: The Carter Center

All relevant rules, regulations, and instructions should be complete and available to the public prior to the electoral event and not created, changed, or adjusted in the midst of the process


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation recommendation for future referendum 4 (pg 73-74) (Voter Registration) Venezuela 2004
by: The Carter Center

Perform an external, third-party audit of the Electoral Registry, analyzing alleged voter “migration”


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation recommendation for future referendum 5 (pg 73-74) (Voting Operations) Venezuela 2004
by: The Carter Center

Streamline voting process and implement procedures more expeditious voting


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation recommendation for future referendum 6 (pg 73-74) (Electoral Integrity and Dispute Resolution) Venezuela 2004
by: The Carter Center

Perform an election day audit of automated voting machines after poll closings; tally sheets should be printed before results transmission and all software/related certifications should be observed by parties and receive independent, third-party certification


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation recommendation for future referendum 7 (pg 73-74) (Electoral Management) Venezuela 2004
by: The Carter Center

Capitalize on the larger pool of election workers and create additional, timely training programs


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation recommendation for future referendum 8 (pg 73-74) (Elections Security) Venezuela 2004
by: The Carter Center

Review the active participation of electoral security in the administration of the electoral process with the aim of stemming allegations of military intimidation or impeding the electoral process


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation recommendation for future referendum 9 (pg 73-74) (Electoral Integrity and Dispute Resolution) Venezuela 2004
by: The Carter Center

Review internal CNE directorate communication and coordination; communicate with and consult more regularly with political parties; and implement greater mechanisms of transparency


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation recommendation for future referendum 10 (pg 73-74) (Electoral Observation) Venezuela 2004
by: The Carter Center

The CNE should be more open to national and international observation, which will enhance confidence and help ensure transparency, integrity, and legitimacy of the process


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Voting Machine Design 1 (Electoral Management) Venezuela 2006
by: The Carter Center

Include the procedures agreed upon by the National Election Commission (CNE) and political groups in the past electoral processes into the Electoral Authority’s regular rules and standard operating procedures


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Voting Machine Design 2 (Electoral Management) Venezuela 2006
by: The Carter Center

Remove the paradigm break in the user interface for the null vote; the touchpad should include a separate button for “null vote,” which should be displaced and confirmed on the touch screen


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Voting Machine Design 3 (Electoral Management) Venezuela 2006
by: The Carter Center

Change the paper trail design to minimize manual handling of the vote slips to prevent unintentional removal of the paper ballot slips from the polling station


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Voting Machine Design 4 (Electoral Management) Venezuela 2006
by: The Carter Center

Provide voters the option to cancel their votes if the receipt does not accurately reflect their choices


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Voting Machine Design 5 (Electoral Management) Venezuela 2006
by: The Carter Center

Include candidate photos/party symbols on the paper slip, enabling illiterate voters to confirm their votes unassisted


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Voting Machine Design 6 (Electoral Management) Venezuela 2006
by: The Carter Center

Reconsider the “two times, three minutes” policy for voters; voters should not lose the right to vote because they have difficulty navigating the technical system in use


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Voting Machine Design 7 (Electoral Management) Venezuela 2006
by: The Carter Center

Make the paper ballot serial number machine readable, ensuring that the serial number becomes a functional security feature that can be verified with a reasonable amount of effort


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Voting Machine Design 8 (Electoral Management) Venezuela 2006
by: The Carter Center

Clarify physical security procedures and require consistent application; these measures should allow table authorities, poll workers, machine operators, and Plan Republican to more easily ensure physical security of machines and make the use of tamper-evident seals more meaningful


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Security of the System 1 (Electoral Integrity and Dispute Resolution) Venezuela 2006
by: The Carter Center

Improve transportation and storage chain-of-custody procedures, possibly by broadening responsibility for security of the technologies during installation and storage to include political parties and civil society groups


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Security of the System 2 (Electoral Integrity and Dispute Resolution) Venezuela 2006
by: The Carter Center

Consider using an independent certificate authority to issue the certifications securing the communications between voting machines and the tally, thus helping protect the central tally system from potential attacks


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Security of the System 3 (Electoral Integrity and Dispute Resolution) Venezuela 2006
by: The Carter Center

Last-minute changes of political party/candidate alliances should not be allowed, therefore preventing the introduction of changes in the PEM not reflected on the ballot


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Audit's 1 (Electoral Integrity and Dispute Resolution) Venezuela 2006
by: The Carter Center

Negotiate complete audit procedures with political parties in advance


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Audit's 2 (Electoral Integrity and Dispute Resolution) Venezuela 2006
by: The Carter Center

During source code audits, accredited party and observation group auditors should be given full and unrestricted access to the source coded, allowing for a more meaningful audit process


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Audit's 3 (Electoral Integrity and Dispute Resolution) Venezuela 2006
by: The Carter Center

Provide complete, detailed system documentation to accredited auditors in advance so they may adequately prepare


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Audit's 4 (Electoral Integrity and Dispute Resolution) Venezuela 2006
by: The Carter Center

Set sample size for pre-dispatch and postelection audits according to appropriate statistical principles


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Audit's 5 (Electoral Integrity and Dispute Resolution) Venezuela 2006
by: The Carter Center

During the hot audit, a comparison of the paper slip count to the machine printed precinct tally result should be mandatory; audited paper slip results should be analyzed by statistical procedures, with clear processes in case of discrepancies between paper and electronic results


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Audit's 6 (Electoral Integrity and Dispute Resolution) Venezuela 2006
by: The Carter Center

Allow paper ballot recount results to be the basis of a legal challenge to electronic election results


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation INCREASED EMPHASIS ON VOTER AND POLL WORKER EDUCATION (Voter Education) Venezuela 2000
by: The Carter Center

Place increased emphasis on voter and poll worker education


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation IMPROVING THE ELECTORAL REGISTRY (Voter Registration) Venezuela 2000
by: The Carter Center

Edit and update the electoral registry with the involvement of political parties


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation RE-ENGINEERING THE VOTING PROCESS (Voting Operations) Venezuela 2000
by: The Carter Center

Re-engineer the voting process to improve the flow of voters through polling sites; suggestions include adding more vote tabulating machines and reducing the number of voters per machine


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation CLARIFYING THE SUBSTITUTION AND ALLIANCE RULES FOR CANDIDATES (Parties and Candidates) Venezuela 2000
by: The Carter Center

Clarify the rules regarding the substitution and alliances of candidates


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation NATIONAL SIMULATIONS AND TEST OF ELECTORAL MACHINERY (Voting Operations) Venezuela 2000
by: The Carter Center

Conduct timely, comprehensive simulations, testing all party of the automated process that are open for scrutiny by political parties, candidates, media, and observer groups


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Audit of the system (Electoral Integrity and Dispute Resolution) Venezuela 2000
by: The Carter Center

Incorporate pre- and post-hoc audits of voting machines and overall electoral process into standard practice


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Nomination of CNE worker (Electoral Management) Venezuela 2000
by: The Carter Center

Adhere carefully to constitutional provisions for the nomination of National Electoral Council (CNE) directors


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation SECURITY OF ELECTORAL MATERIALS and ballots (Elections Security) Venezuela 2000
by: The Carter Center

Institute adequate controls over electoral materials and ballots


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Appeal to results (Electoral Dispute Resolution) Venezuela 2000
by: The Carter Center

Handle appeals in a timely, impartial manner; the CNE should redouble its efforts to resolve pending cases and publish its decisions in the national media


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.1. General Considerations, paragraph 1 (Election Administration) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

The EU EOM recommends that the electoral authorities of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela continue to develop the process of dialog with political parties and civil society organisations in order to increase the level of trust in future election processes. The high turnout registered in the Presidential Elections, the generally peaceful atmosphere in which they were held, and the general acceptance of the election results by political parties, are powerful arguments in favour of this necessary dialog.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.1. General Considerations, paragraph 2 (Civil Society and domestic Observation) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

The role of national observation is critical for the credibility of elections. The EU EOM recommends that the participation of national observation organisations in future processes be promoted. Similarly, it proposes that limitations on the number of observers that they can deploy be dropped, as long as they comply with the requirements that guarantee effective and independent work.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.2. Legal Framework (Legal Framework) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

The laws that govern election processes contain inconsistencies and vacuums that could be solved through the approval, by the National Assembly of a General Basic Law, or with a new General Electoral Regulation adopted by the CNE. These texts should establish clearly and definitively all the key aspects of election processes in accordance with the 1999 Constitution, and international principles and good practices. In this manner, the CNE would be exempted from having to publish such a large number of regulations for all election processes, at times at very advanced stages of the process. The EU EOM had already detected this failing in 2005, which the Basic Law of Suffrage and Political Parties of 1998 contemplated solving with the approval of a General Electoral Regulation. Whatever the chosen formula, be it an Organic Law or a General Regulation, it would be important that it be adopted in consensus with the largest possible number of the country’s political forces, regardless of whether they are represented in the National Assembly, or not.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.3. Electoral Administration, paragraph 1 (Election Administration) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

The EU EOM recommends that the CNE give greater priority to the sanctioning instruments for electoral crimes and faults as foreseen in the Basic Law of Suffrage and Political Participation and reflected in the regulations that it has adopted. Inasmuch as possible, the goal is to dissuade and punish the perpetration of such actions, before the end of the election campaign. The EU EOM further proposes that the participation of public servants in election campaign activities, be it voluntary or induced, be investigated and sanctioned, in accordance with Venezuelan law and international election practices. The exercise of the sanctioning powers, which the CNE is endowed with by law, would benefit the credibility and legitimacy of the Electoral Power, and of election processes per se.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.3. Electoral Administration, paragraph 2 (Election Administration) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

The New Basic Law or the new General Electoral Regulation could contribute to put an end to the controversy around certain procedures of the electoral administration, especially giving a legal foundation to the role of election coordinators, and of components of the Plan República in election processes. Although in the Presidential Elections both figures limited themselves, in general, to the fulfilment of their basically logistical and security functions in a professional, effective, and neutral manner, with some minor exceptions. Despite the fact that their role in the process was clarified through CNE public declarations destined to this end; their participation in the election process is still viewed with mistrust by some parties and citizens.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.3. Electoral Administration, paragraph 3 (Election Administration) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

Furthermore, the EU EOM recommends that at the designated closing time for voting centres on Election Day, only those voters that are queuing to vote at that moment be allowed to vote, and not those that join the queue afterwards. Such a measure would require amending existing legislation, and would put Venezuela in line with common practice in neighbouring countries and internationally; putting an end to the accusations of interested extended voting hours, which have been repeatedly heard in recent election processes, including the 2006 Presidential Elections, although in this case they were more subdued than in the past.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.3. Electoral Administration, paragraph 4 (Election Administration) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

If the use of indelible ink is to be continued as one of the mechanisms to prevent double voting, it is recommended that the ink that is used be less easily erased, than that which was used for the 2006 Presidential Elections


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.4. Electronic Voting System, paragraph 1 (Voter Education) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

The EU EOM proposes that the CNE extend the period of the public testing campaigns of the voting machines right until a few days before to the elections. In this manner, it would help to familiarise voters with the technology and lead to a better understanding of the electronic voting system. The CNE could organise this voter education campaign together with national civil society organisations.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.4. Electronic Voting System, paragraph 2 (Election Administration) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

Better training for Polling Station members, voting machine operators, and support technicians, together with a more precise definition of the procedures for voting centres and Polling Stations could avoid uncertainties or contradictions in the performance of their tasks. This improvement would directly reduce the reaction time in case of contingencies, and bring about greater efficiency in the processes carried out in Polling Stations, such as the setup, polling, transmission, or audit of closing.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.4. Electronic Voting System, paragraph 3 (Election Administration) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

The EU EOM recommends that if the CNE decides to continue using the fingerprint readers in the future, it clearly defines and delimits their use as part of the voting process. In case of having sufficient fingerprint readers so as to incorporate them to all voting centres, and in accordance with the directive to develop the electronic voting system, as established by Venezuelan law, the readers could substitute the hard copy voter lists, as well as serving for the identification of voters, and the verification of their right to vote, providing that the current mistrust of the electorate and the political forces is overcome. They could also be used as a method to avoid multiple voting, accompanied by a really effective indelible ink. In the EU EOM’s opinion, these measures should be followed by a broad reaching public outreach campaign to eliminate the existing prejudices that exist among voters regarding the fingerprint readers. The Electoral Power, responsible for such a sovereign decision, should assess the economic costs of such a measure, and consider the need to provide far more technical training to Polling Station staff, which should be able to handle a more complex device than that which is in use at present.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.4. Electronic Voting System, paragraph 4 (Election Administration) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

On the basis of the positive results of the audits performed during the 2006 Presidential Elections, and taking advantage of the degree of expertise acquired by the technical experts of the different candidates and national election observation groups, it would be a positive step for the CNE to systematically maintain programmes for quality management with external technical experts, both for the REP as well as for the electronic voting system. This would increase the level of trust of the political parties, the media, and the public in general in the system.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.4. Electronic Voting System, paragraph 5 (Voter Registration) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

The EU EOM observed that many of the problems that had been identified by various civil society organisations in the REP are due to the civil registration and ID Card system. For the CNE to win over the trust of the citizens in the electoral register, the integrity of both these systems must be ensured. To this end, it suggests that joint actions be organised between the offices responsible for the civil register, the electoral register, and the ID Cards to tidy, update, and restore the integrity of the respective databases in a synchronised manner.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.5. The Media, paragraph 1 (Media) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

The suspension of institutional publicity be it at a national, state, or local level and a clear limitation on the public activities of all public servants and elected positions during the election campaign period would put an end to the risk of institutional bias, and the use of state resources in benefit of some candidates. Both the Basic Law of Suffrage and Political Parties24, and international good practices, contemplate such limitations. Furthermore, the CNE, and then Venezuelan Public Ministry should make use of the sanctioning instruments they have at their disposal to combat violations, which can also be denounced by any citizen or the legal representatives of the political parties.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.5. The Media, paragraph 2 (Media) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

Furthermore, the EU EOM recommends that the Venezuelan media adopt selfregulatory measures, to avoid the excessive partisan bias with which the majority cover the election campaign. Impartiality is a specific mandate enshrined in Venezuelan law and of exacting professional journalistic standards, and need not contradict the right of the private media to express openly and honestly the editorial line of their choice.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report