Recommendations —
English
 

Election Observation Portal - Recommendations Database

Country

Year

Topic

Organization

Recommendation status


Keywords (full text search)




3752 recommendations
Recommendation N/A (Media) Peru 2001
by: The Carter Center

Private media should adopt a voluntary ethnical code for political news coverage


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation N/A (Media) Peru 2001
by: The Carter Center

State-controlled media should be required to provide accurate, impartial coverage of political parties and figures


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation N/A (Media) Peru 2001
by: The Carter Center

Local news media should be required to provide free air time and space to political contestants during campaigns


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation N/A (Electoral Dispute Resolution) Peru 2001
by: The Carter Center

Pursue investigations and, where appropriate, prosecutions or administrative sanctions where government resources may have been used for partisan political purposes


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation N/A (Electoral Integrity and Dispute Resolution) Peru 2001
by: The Carter Center

Obligate government officials standing for election to meet stringent requirements to prevent the use of state resources for electoral advantage


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation N/A (Electoral Integrity and Dispute Resolution) Peru 2001
by: The Carter Center

Enact governmental transparency measures to ensure the integrity of public institutions


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation N/A (Legal Framework) Zambia 2001
by: The Carter Center

Conduct a nationwide consultative process on electoral reform that includes a wide range of participants


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation N/A (Legal Framework) Zambia 2001
by: The Carter Center

Amend the constitution, setting a specific date or window for elections


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation N/A (Legal Framework) Zambia 2001
by: The Carter Center

Repeal the requirement that successful presidential candidates secure only a simple majority


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation N/A (Legal Framework) Zambia 2001
by: The Carter Center

Remove exceptions for the president and vice president in the Code of Conduct and the Public Order Act; empower local magistrates to review decisions taken by the police


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation N/A (Legal Framework) Zambia 2001
by: The Carter Center

Acknowledge legal status of nonpartisan monitors; eliminate barriers; allow access to information; permit observers/party agents to receive copies of results from stations and tabulation centers


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation N/A (Legal Framework) Zambia 2001
by: The Carter Center

Establish legal regulations on the allocation of media time and the purchase of campaign ads


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation N/A (Voter Registration) Zambia 2001
by: The Carter Center

Set new criteria for determining the location/quantity of registration centers based on a maximum distance between centers and/or a maximum number of voters per center


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation N/A (Voter Registration) Zambia 2001
by: The Carter Center

Ensure all citizens receive a national registration card and/or other forms allowable to qualify for a voter registration card and implement procedures for continuous and mobile voter registration


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation N/A (Voter Registration) Zambia 2001
by: The Carter Center

Streamline voter registration card process; disseminate voters list on a timely basis, at a reasonable cost


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation N/A (Voter Education) Zambia 2001
by: The Carter Center

Provide a clear legal mandate and resources to provide for voter education


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation N/A (Electoral Management) Zambia 2001
by: The Carter Center

Require that the election commission publish a comprehensive election calendar in all major media outlets and consult with provincial and district officers on logistical arrangements


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation N/A (Electoral Management) Zambia 2001
by: The Carter Center

Require that the Electoral Commission of Zambia (ECZ) produce a document, well in advance of elections, specifying all procedures associated with the counting, tabulation, release of results, and the verification process


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation N/A (Results) Zambia 2001
by: The Carter Center

Require that election results be posted at voting stations and constituency tabulation centers; require publication of provisional and final results by station and by constituency in the major media outlets


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation N/A (Electoral Dispute Resolution) Zambia 2001
by: The Carter Center

Remove security fees for election petitions, allow petitions to be lodged during the electoral process, require timely interventions; documents relating to cases should be publicly available


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation N/A (Electoral Management) Zambia 2001
by: The Carter Center

Make the ECZ independent of the executive, with funding directly from Parliament; members should be appointed from civil society/political parties, have a fixed tenure, and abide by a code of conduct


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation N/A (Electoral Management) Zambia 2001
by: The Carter Center

Review enforcement bodies, including the ECZ, police, and Office of the Director of Public Prosecution, evaluating their mandates, capacity to address corruption, and adherence to the Code


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation N/A (Parties and Candidates) Zambia 2001
by: The Carter Center

Consider political party funding on the basis of the principle of a reasonably equitable process; consider public disclosure requirements and limits on external funds


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation N/A (Media) Zambia 2001
by: The Carter Center

Consider steps to increase the independence of government sponsored media; empower local magistrates to reprimand violators and corrective measures should be taken immediately


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation N/A (Electoral Dispute Resolution) Zambia 2001
by: The Carter Center

Address the need to create effective mechanisms to manage electoral disputes, including creating a legal mandate for Conflict Management Committees (CMCs) and providing for any necessary enforcement mechanisms


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Recommendation 1 (Legal Framework) Timor-Leste 2002
by: The Carter Center

Develop strong, efficient electoral laws and policies


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Recommendation 2 (Electoral Management) Timor-Leste 2002
by: The Carter Center

Establish a permanent electoral commission with a mandate to articulate/promulgate appropriate electoral procedures


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Recommendation 3 (Voter Registration) Timor-Leste 2002
by: The Carter Center

Develop an adequate and comprehensive voters list


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Recommendation 4 (Voting Operations) Timor-Leste 2002
by: The Carter Center

Prioritize expanding the base of polling staff by recruiting new election and poll workers; provide additional capacity building programs


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Recommendation 5 (Electoral Dispute Resolution) Timor-Leste 2002
by: The Carter Center

Develop an effective electoral complaints mechanism, understood by and accessible to the public


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Recommendation 6 (Parties and Candidates) Timor-Leste 2002
by: The Carter Center

Political parties should work to establish and strengthen political platforms and develop internally democratic and decentralized party structures


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Recommendation 7 (Parties and Candidates) Timor-Leste 2002
by: The Carter Center

Strengthen party structures to reach from the national to the village level


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Recommendation 8 (Electoral Observation) Timor-Leste 2002
by: The Carter Center

Domestic observation groups are encouraged to broaden their scope to include activities ranging from accompanying ballots to designing counting centers


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Recommendation 9 (Electoral Observation) Timor-Leste 2002
by: The Carter Center

Local civil society groups should continue to strengthen their capacity to monitor and report on political developments, including election processes, and work to improve networking and collaboration between such groups


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Recommendation 1 (Voting Operations) Jamaica 2002
by: The Carter Center

Re-engineer voting stations and simplify electoral procedures


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Recommendation 2 (Voter Identification) Jamaica 2002
by: The Carter Center

Increase emphasis on voter education and use of ID cards to speed the voting process


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation Recommendation 3 (Voting Operations) Jamaica 2002
by: The Carter Center

Simplify and amend voting procedures


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.1. General Considerations, paragraph 1 (Election Administration) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

The EU EOM recommends that the electoral authorities of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela continue to develop the process of dialog with political parties and civil society organisations in order to increase the level of trust in future election processes. The high turnout registered in the Presidential Elections, the generally peaceful atmosphere in which they were held, and the general acceptance of the election results by political parties, are powerful arguments in favour of this necessary dialog.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.1. General Considerations, paragraph 2 (Civil Society and domestic Observation) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

The role of national observation is critical for the credibility of elections. The EU EOM recommends that the participation of national observation organisations in future processes be promoted. Similarly, it proposes that limitations on the number of observers that they can deploy be dropped, as long as they comply with the requirements that guarantee effective and independent work.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.2. Legal Framework (Legal Framework) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

The laws that govern election processes contain inconsistencies and vacuums that could be solved through the approval, by the National Assembly of a General Basic Law, or with a new General Electoral Regulation adopted by the CNE. These texts should establish clearly and definitively all the key aspects of election processes in accordance with the 1999 Constitution, and international principles and good practices. In this manner, the CNE would be exempted from having to publish such a large number of regulations for all election processes, at times at very advanced stages of the process. The EU EOM had already detected this failing in 2005, which the Basic Law of Suffrage and Political Parties of 1998 contemplated solving with the approval of a General Electoral Regulation. Whatever the chosen formula, be it an Organic Law or a General Regulation, it would be important that it be adopted in consensus with the largest possible number of the country’s political forces, regardless of whether they are represented in the National Assembly, or not.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.3. Electoral Administration, paragraph 1 (Election Administration) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

The EU EOM recommends that the CNE give greater priority to the sanctioning instruments for electoral crimes and faults as foreseen in the Basic Law of Suffrage and Political Participation and reflected in the regulations that it has adopted. Inasmuch as possible, the goal is to dissuade and punish the perpetration of such actions, before the end of the election campaign. The EU EOM further proposes that the participation of public servants in election campaign activities, be it voluntary or induced, be investigated and sanctioned, in accordance with Venezuelan law and international election practices. The exercise of the sanctioning powers, which the CNE is endowed with by law, would benefit the credibility and legitimacy of the Electoral Power, and of election processes per se.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.3. Electoral Administration, paragraph 2 (Election Administration) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

The New Basic Law or the new General Electoral Regulation could contribute to put an end to the controversy around certain procedures of the electoral administration, especially giving a legal foundation to the role of election coordinators, and of components of the Plan República in election processes. Although in the Presidential Elections both figures limited themselves, in general, to the fulfilment of their basically logistical and security functions in a professional, effective, and neutral manner, with some minor exceptions. Despite the fact that their role in the process was clarified through CNE public declarations destined to this end; their participation in the election process is still viewed with mistrust by some parties and citizens.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.3. Electoral Administration, paragraph 3 (Election Administration) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

Furthermore, the EU EOM recommends that at the designated closing time for voting centres on Election Day, only those voters that are queuing to vote at that moment be allowed to vote, and not those that join the queue afterwards. Such a measure would require amending existing legislation, and would put Venezuela in line with common practice in neighbouring countries and internationally; putting an end to the accusations of interested extended voting hours, which have been repeatedly heard in recent election processes, including the 2006 Presidential Elections, although in this case they were more subdued than in the past.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.3. Electoral Administration, paragraph 4 (Election Administration) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

If the use of indelible ink is to be continued as one of the mechanisms to prevent double voting, it is recommended that the ink that is used be less easily erased, than that which was used for the 2006 Presidential Elections


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.4. Electronic Voting System, paragraph 1 (Voter Education) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

The EU EOM proposes that the CNE extend the period of the public testing campaigns of the voting machines right until a few days before to the elections. In this manner, it would help to familiarise voters with the technology and lead to a better understanding of the electronic voting system. The CNE could organise this voter education campaign together with national civil society organisations.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.4. Electronic Voting System, paragraph 2 (Election Administration) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

Better training for Polling Station members, voting machine operators, and support technicians, together with a more precise definition of the procedures for voting centres and Polling Stations could avoid uncertainties or contradictions in the performance of their tasks. This improvement would directly reduce the reaction time in case of contingencies, and bring about greater efficiency in the processes carried out in Polling Stations, such as the setup, polling, transmission, or audit of closing.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.4. Electronic Voting System, paragraph 3 (Election Administration) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

The EU EOM recommends that if the CNE decides to continue using the fingerprint readers in the future, it clearly defines and delimits their use as part of the voting process. In case of having sufficient fingerprint readers so as to incorporate them to all voting centres, and in accordance with the directive to develop the electronic voting system, as established by Venezuelan law, the readers could substitute the hard copy voter lists, as well as serving for the identification of voters, and the verification of their right to vote, providing that the current mistrust of the electorate and the political forces is overcome. They could also be used as a method to avoid multiple voting, accompanied by a really effective indelible ink. In the EU EOM’s opinion, these measures should be followed by a broad reaching public outreach campaign to eliminate the existing prejudices that exist among voters regarding the fingerprint readers. The Electoral Power, responsible for such a sovereign decision, should assess the economic costs of such a measure, and consider the need to provide far more technical training to Polling Station staff, which should be able to handle a more complex device than that which is in use at present.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.4. Electronic Voting System, paragraph 4 (Election Administration) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

On the basis of the positive results of the audits performed during the 2006 Presidential Elections, and taking advantage of the degree of expertise acquired by the technical experts of the different candidates and national election observation groups, it would be a positive step for the CNE to systematically maintain programmes for quality management with external technical experts, both for the REP as well as for the electronic voting system. This would increase the level of trust of the political parties, the media, and the public in general in the system.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.4. Electronic Voting System, paragraph 5 (Voter Registration) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

The EU EOM observed that many of the problems that had been identified by various civil society organisations in the REP are due to the civil registration and ID Card system. For the CNE to win over the trust of the citizens in the electoral register, the integrity of both these systems must be ensured. To this end, it suggests that joint actions be organised between the offices responsible for the civil register, the electoral register, and the ID Cards to tidy, update, and restore the integrity of the respective databases in a synchronised manner.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14.5. The Media, paragraph 1 (Media) Venezuela 2006
by: EU

The suspension of institutional publicity be it at a national, state, or local level and a clear limitation on the public activities of all public servants and elected positions during the election campaign period would put an end to the risk of institutional bias, and the use of state resources in benefit of some candidates. Both the Basic Law of Suffrage and Political Parties24, and international good practices, contemplate such limitations. Furthermore, the CNE, and then Venezuelan Public Ministry should make use of the sanctioning instruments they have at their disposal to combat violations, which can also be denounced by any citizen or the legal representatives of the political parties.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report