International observation plays an important role in safeguarding election integrity. This role may be compromised if election observers do not follow certain rules that should guide their conduct during their mission.

International Observers' Role in Maintaining Election Integrity

Serious and professional international observation can help maintain election integrity in many ways:

• Disseminating international standards and good practices: Electoral administrators, politicians and national observers can learn to better understand international standards for free and fair elections by engaging in liaison with international observers and studying their reports. International observer missions also provide electoral administrators the opportunity for comparative exchange of professional knowledge with other experts, particularly on integrity mechanisms.
• Deterring integrity problems. The presence of international observers monitoring the election process may help deter attempts to disrupt or tamper with the process. There is a public perception in most countries that international observers will be able to uncover fraud on election day.[1]  But, in fact, this perception may be misplaced since international observers have only limited data and may not understand the ”local” way of doing things.

·         Detecting integrity problems. Experienced observers can detect problems or questionable activities, and bring them to the attention of the election management body and the public. International observers, like national ones, cannot actually intervene in an electoral procedure, but may ask questions about its conduct in an informational way. Early identification of issues in this manner can allow a problem to be solved before it is too late.

·         Holding a fragile process together. In situations of conflict or in countries in transition, the presence of international observers can to some extent deter violence and intimidation. Their ongoing presence may help reassure candidates, monitors and voters that it is safe to participate. The presence of international observers may also convince opposition politicians that competing in the election is preferable to boycotting, or engaging in civil disobedience or disturbance.[2]

• Increasing the credibility and legitimacy of the process. Through their reporting and analysis, observers can uphold or denigrate the legitimacy of the electoral process and its outcome. If their reports show that the election is proceeding within acceptable parameters, this finding reinforces the acceptability of the process and the legitimacy of the results.
• Developing the capacity of national observers. If international observation is occurring simultaneously with national observation, the example set by international observers can help develop and improve the capacity of national observation efforts. For example, international observers can provide a model to emulate concerning how to set up a nationwide election observation effort, conduct a parallel vote tabulation and assimilating field observation reports.  They can also encourage national observers, and perhaps inform them of standards and best practices relevant to their activities.
• Relationship with national observers.  But it must be cautioned that international observers should not actually coordinate with national observers in terms of deployments or other aspects of their mission, since that would potentially detract from the perceived independence of the international observers and their accountability to the organization which has authorized and supported their mission.  Similarly, international observers should not share non-public information concerning their activities or impressions since that might compromise mission security and lead to unauthorized disclosures of information.

 Rules of Conduct for International Observers

To ensure the legitimacy of their work, international observers have to follow internationally recognized standards of conduct. Several organizations that specialize in international observation have developed codes of conduct to guide such observers’ behaviour. The main requirements for ethical and professional observation are as follows:[3]

• Respect the sovereignty of the host country. To maintain the credibility and effectiveness of their election observation mission, international observers must respect the laws of the host country and the rules of its election management body. They must not attempt to give instructions to electoral administrators or interfere with governance of the country being observed. They must also respect accreditation rules during their mission.
• Objectivity. To be effective, international observation must be objective and non-partisan, and must provide balanced reports. Objectivity protects the credibility of the mission and helps maintain the integrity of the electoral process. When observers do their work, they must be very careful not to show a preference for any particular party or candidate lest they compromise the objectivity required for preparing impartial reports.
• Non-interference in the election process. International observers must not interfere with the work of electoral administrators. Their mandate is not to supervise, correct mistakes or resolve local conflicts, but only to observe, report and assess.
• Accuracy. The reliability of the observation and assessment depends on the accuracy with which international observers report the facts. Many of the observers do not have an opportunity to observe the entire electoral process; accordingly, they must avoid generalizing on the basis of limited observations. Observation reports should clearly indicate the basis for the information presented, and not extrapolate beyond it.
• Avoid conflicts of interest. Election observation should be kept strictly separate from technical assistance for elections. International observers should not be engaged in electoral assistance activities in the country where they are observing (for example, assisting electoral administrators, developing electoral legislation or training election staff). Professional and credible assessment of an electoral process requires reasonable separation from the administration being observed.