Political parties organize rallies during an election campaign in order to reinforce links between political leaderships, party activists and party supporters. Electoral rallies are also demonstrations of strength, unity and power.
In conflict-prone societies where political divides often correspond with social divides, election rallies may represent high-risk events. Irrespective of the organizer’s intentions, the use of inflammatory rhetoric and hate speech can quickly inspire violent action. Additionally, actions taken to limit, obstruct or prevent competitors from holding political rallies may trigger violent reactions.
Empirical cases:
[1] Human Rights Watch, ‘Crushing Dissent’, 22 January 2004, p. 12, available at <http://www.hrw.org/en/node/12183/section/6>.
[2] Human Rights Watch, ‘Azerbaijan: Presidential Elections 2003’, Briefing Paper, 13 October 2003, pp. 4, 17, available at <http://www.hrw.org/legacy/backgrounder/eca/azerbaijan/azerbaijan-elections2003.pdf>, accessed 8 November 2011.
[3] Human Rights Watch, ‘Azerbaijan: A Stolen Election and Oil Stability’, 20 October 2003, available at <http://www.hrw.org/news/2003/10/19/azerbaijan-stolen-election-and-oil-stability>, accessed 8 November 2011.
[4] Carter Center, ‘Observing the 2008 Nepal Constituent Assembly Election’, April 2008, pp. 35–6, available at <http://www.cartercenter.org/resources/pdfs/news/peace_publications/election_reports/FinalReportNepal2008.pdf>.
[5] International Crisis Group, ‘Nepal’s Election: A Peaceful Revolution?’, Asia Report no. 155 (2008), pp. 10, 11, available at <http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/asia/south-asia/nepal/155_nepal_s_elections___a_peaceful_revolution.pdf>, accessed 26 September 2011.