Recommendation Provide Reasonable Electoral Conditions for Candidates and Voters in East Jerusalem, paragraph 1 (Election Administration) Palestine 2005 —
You are here: Home → Support and Advice → Observation Portal → Recommendations → Data → Recommendation Provide Reasonable Electoral Conditions for Candidates and Voters in East Jerusalem, paragraph 1 (Election Administration) Palestine 2005
English
 
Subscribe to ACE Newsletter
These topic pages provide a quick overview and easy access to all content that can be found on ACE for any give topic of interest - weather encyclopaedia files, electoral materials, comparative data, consolidated replies, case studies, or other.

ELECTORAL FRAMEWORK

Legal Framework Boundary Delimitation Electoral Systems

ELECTORAL PARTICIPATION

Gender and Elections Parties and Candidates Disability and Elections Media and Elections Civic and Voter Education Direct Democracy

ELECTORAL MANAGEMENT

Electoral Management Cost of Elections

ELECTORAL INTEGRITY

Electoral Integrity Campaign Finance Measuring Electoral Quality Election Observation Electoral Assistance

ELECTORAL OPERATIONS

Voter Registration Voting Operations Voter Identification Results Management Out of Country Voting Elections and Technology Elections and Security
Countries
Encyclopaedia Electoral Materials Comparative Data Election Calendar Observation Portal BRIDGE Extended Learning Latest Updates
Ask the Experts Consolidated Replies Find An Expert Access ACE Practitioners' Workspace
About ACE The History of ACE Contact ACE ACE Partners Practitioners' Network FAQ

Recommendation Provide Reasonable Electoral Conditions for Candidates and Voters in East Jerusalem, paragraph 1 (Election Administration) Palestine 2005

http://aceproject.org/ero-en/regions/mideast/PS/palestine-final-report-presidential-elections-eu-1/at_download/file

It is imperative that the electoral process in East Jerusalem is conducted in an equal manner as far as possible in comparison to the other electoral constituencies. Whilst it is understood that Annex II of the Declaration of Principles may still be relevant, it is hoped that good will and common sense will prevail in this respect to prevent a recurrence of the problems which characterised the process in Jerusalem in both 1996 and 2005.

Document Actions