Recommendations —
English
 

Election Observation Portal - Recommendations Database

Country

Year

Topic

Organization

Recommendation status


Keywords (full text search)




3752 recommendations
Recommendation 15 (Electronic Voting) Kazakhstan 2007
by: OSCE

To preserve the secrecy of the vote, the user-generated four-digit control code should
be eliminated, and the voter register component of the system should be separated
from the voting component.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 5 (Electronic Voting) France 2007
by: OSCE

The transparency of the certification process should be enhanced, including access by local authorities, political parties, observers, and relevant civil society groups to certification reports.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 6 (Electronic Voting) France 2007
by: OSCE

Audits should be conducted at various stages of the process to ensure that adequate security procedures are being followed by local authorities.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 7 (Electronic Voting) France 2007
by: OSCE

Legislation and regulations for electronic voting machines should include provisions requiring Voter Verified Paper Audit Trails (VVPAT) or an equivalent verification procedure. The legislation should provide for meaningful post-election recounts and audits of results.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 8 (Electronic Voting) France 2007
by: OSCE

Usability of voting machines should be improved, and more extensive voter education efforts should be conducted.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 3 (Internet Voting) Estonia 2007
by: OSCE

The OSCE/ODIHR recommends that legislation in relation to internet voting be adapted
accordingly.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 4 (Internet Voting) Estonia 2007
by: OSCE

The OSCE/ODIHR recommends that the NEC review the process of counting internet
votes and announcing the results to ensure that all devices used are subject to adequate
security measures.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 5 (Internet Voting) Estonia 2007
by: OSCE

The OSCE/ODIHR recommends that a full scale end-to-end test be performed on the
entire system prior to each election. This would include all of the components and all
transactions in the process. It is also recommended to test the system with a known
outcome, for example, by predetermining how test voters should vote and comparing this
with the actual tabulation of their votes.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 6 (Internet Voting) Estonia 2007
by: OSCE

The OSCE/ODIHR recommends that in addition to the audits of the process now
conducted, all components of the system, including the source code, should be audited by an independent body in accordance with publicly available specifications, with all reports made public.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 7 (Internet Voting) Estonia 2007
by: OSCE

The OSCE/ODIHR EAM recommends that the NEC consider modifying the design of the
internet voting system so that the time of voting is not recorded. In the interests of maintaining the transparency of the system, however, the log should continue to be
available to observers.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 8 (Internet Voting) Estonia 2007
by: OSCE

The OSCE/ODIHR recommends that monitoring and response to potential threats coming from the internet should be more systematic and include a plan to deal with such threats, with well-defined roles for each institution. In addition, the monitoring of the Vote Storage Server should be improved to provide greater assurance that no unauthorized access via the internet has affected the integrity of the data.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 9 (Internet Voting) Estonia 2007
by: OSCE

Given the considerable percentage of Estonian citizens who consider Russian as their first language, and given that some of these voters would meet the Estonian government’s definition of a national minority, the OSCE/ODIHR recommends that consideration be given to making the voting interface available in the Russian language.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 10 (Internet Voting) Estonia 2007
by: OSCE

The OSCE/ODIHR recommends greater participation of parties and civil society in monitoring of the internet voting system to provide an opportunity to identify potential weaknesses and security concerns. The OSCE/ODIHR further recommends consideration of a more defined division of duties among the staff implementing internet voting such that no one person would be involved with the entire process.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 11 (Internet Voting) Estonia 2007
by: OSCE

In addition, the OSCE/ODIHR recommends that unless the challenging issues pertaining to internet voting outlined in this report can be effectively addressed, the authorities should carefully reconsider whether the internet should be widely available as a voting method, or alternatively whether it should be used only on a limited basis or at all.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 20 (Electronic Voting) United States of America 2008
by: OSCE

A transparent process of testing and certifying voting systems should be required to
ensure integrity of voting systems.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 21 (Electronic Voting) United States of America 2008
by: OSCE

Voluntary Voting System Guidelines as adopted by the EAC could be integrated into
state regulations to ensure a more transparent and uniform implementation of voting
systems.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 22 (Electronic Voting) United States of America 2008
by: OSCE

Consideration should be given to the design of electronic voting equipment so that a
change or error in its software would not cause an undetectable change or error in the
voting results. This, for instance, can be ensured by using a voter-verifiable paper audit
trail or cryptography measures.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 23 (Electronic Voting) United States of America 2008
by: OSCE

States could consider an audit of the results obtained from the electronic voting machine
as part of the standard counting process.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 24 (Electronic Voting) United States of America 2008
by: OSCE

DREs and optical scan machines should be arranged in polling stations in a way to ensure the secrecy of the vote.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 25 (Electronic Voting) United States of America 2008
by: OSCE

The transparency and the integrity of electronic voting equipment should be continuously enhanced and public trust in the voting systems further promoted.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 11 (Electronic Voting) United States of America 2010
by: OSCE

The trend towards the use of new voting technologies which use either VVPATs or hand- or computer-marked paper ballots is positive. Authorities could consider adopting federal legislation for the mandatory use of a paper trail in elections, including federal standards on mandatory hand-recounts of paper ballots and VVPATs.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 12 (Electronic Voting) United States of America 2010
by: OSCE

In line with international good practice, NVTs should be introduced on a gradual basis and with testing under realistic conditions prior to election day. This would allow meaningful evaluation after each step, as well as help to build trust among stakeholders.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 13 (Electronic Voting) United States of America 2010
by: OSCE

Ensuring public funding of evaluation would enhance the credibility and independence of the certification process.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14 (Electronic Voting) United States of America 2010
by: OSCE

The federal authorities could harmonize the certification requirements across states by introducing a mandatory set of minimum requirements. This would reduce both costs and time needed for evaluation of customized systems because state certification could build upon federal certification.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 15 (Electronic Voting) United States of America 2010
by: OSCE

Before starting projects on remote electronic voting, federal evaluation and certification of remote electronic voting products should be intensified prior to public test or even use. Pilot projects should be given the necessary time and financial resources to be tested comprehensively to ensure reliability, security and integrity.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 1 (Internet Voting) Norway 2011
by: OSCE

It is recommended that the legal framework is further delineated to include formalized procedures and a time plan for the conduct of internet voting from set-up and operation to counting. Special attention could be given to the experience and best practice gathered in the course of this pilot project.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 2 (Internet Voting) Norway 2011
by: OSCE

It is recommended that for internet voting, a body with the power to oversee internet voting is formalized. The authorities could determine the distribution of roles and responsibilities between stakeholders involved in internet voting.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 3 (Internet Voting) Norway 2011
by: OSCE

It is recommended that election authorities fully test the final version of the internet voting system in test elections before using it in regular, binding elections.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 4 (Internet Voting) Norway 2011
by: OSCE

The election authorities could consider producing and publishing command level protocols and appropriate instructions for installing and configuring all hardware and software components.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 5 (Internet Voting) Norway 2011
by: OSCE

In addition, a detailed operational document could be compiled, comprising all internet voting procedures, to be made publicly available ahead of the election. This could be used as the basis for any audit.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 6 (Internet Voting) Norway 2011
by: OSCE

In order to enhance the integrity of the overall internet voting process, it is recommended that the printing process of polling cards be further tested and improved, allowing enough time for proper testing.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 7 (Internet Voting) Norway 2011
by: OSCE

It is recommended that procedures are developed to ensure that no internet votes cast are invalidated because of late voter register updates.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 8 (Internet Voting) Norway 2011
by: OSCE

It is recommended to establish clear criteria for determining invalid votes in the electoral framework and that procedures are updated to ensure timely detection thereof.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 9 (Internet Voting) Norway 2011
by: OSCE

The election authorities could describe and formalize the process of data destruction in detail within the regulatory framework.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 10 (Internet Voting) Norway 2011
by: OSCE

It is recommended that strict separation of duties is defined and documented at all levels, and included in the electoral regulatory framework.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 11 (Internet Voting) Norway 2011
by: OSCE

It is recommended that the ministry documents the procedures for the management of secret election keys in detail.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 12 (Internet Voting) Norway 2011
by: OSCE

It is recommended that the ministry continues to improve the encryption model in order to further tighten the security and secrecy of the vote as well as to reduce complexity in set-up, configuration and testing.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 13 (Internet Voting) Norway 2011
by: OSCE

The election authorities could consider informing voters of the potential risks of voting over the internet and how best protect their computers against malicious software.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 14 (Internet Voting) Norway 2011
by: OSCE

It is recommended that election authorities consider collaboration with relevant agencies actively engaged in providing monitoring and general security of the internet connectivity and, include entities that own and operate major parts of the internet backbone in Norway.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 15 (Internet Voting) Norway 2011
by: OSCE

It is recommended that the election authorities publish the version of the software to be used in internet voting in advance of the opening of the polls.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 16 (Internet Voting) Norway 2011
by: OSCE

The election authorities could consider delegating formal certification of the internet voting software to an independent competent third party to further increase accountability and transparency.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 17 (Internet Voting) Norway 2011
by: OSCE

The election authorities could include provisions in the regulations to explicitly allow for audits to assess if the conduct of the internet voting system functions as intended.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 18 (Internet Voting) Norway 2011
by: OSCE

In order to formalize and ensure adherence to events in the conduct of elections, and in order to provide further transparency of internet voting, the election authorities could prepare a detailed election calendar in advance of the election period.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 19 (Internet Voting) Norway 2011
by: OSCE

The election authorities could consider providing trainings to political party representatives and domestic non-partisan observers to familiarize them with the internet voting process and raise awareness for effective election observation.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 20 (Internet Voting) Norway 2011
by: OSCE

It is recommended that the election authorities conduct a full review of the impact of return codes on the security and secrecy of the vote, as well as the timeliness of the universal verification of the count, with the aim to allow for full end-to-end verifiability of elections.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 7 (Electronic Voting) Latvia 2011
by: OSCE

If the CEC continues with plans to introduce new technologies in the counting process, consideration should be given to ensuring comprehensive training and a detailed procedural manual for polling station members.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 4 (Internet Voting) Switzerland 2011
by: OSCE

In order to comply fully with paragraph 8 of the 1990 Copenhagen Document, the OSCE/ODIHR reiterates its recommendation that the electoral legislation should be amended to allow explicitly for international and domestic non-partisan observers. This should include specific provisions to ensure effective observation of internet voting.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 7 (Internet Voting) Switzerland 2011
by: OSCE

Regulations for internet voting should be further detailed in the law. This could include clarifying provisions regarding the procedural steps for internet voting, standards for cryptographic methods, testing requirements, operational duties and responsibilities, certification requirements, and aspects of law governing hosting by other cantons or outsourcing to private companies.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 8 (Internet Voting) Switzerland 2011
by: OSCE

In order to ensure data protection standards are adhered to, it is recommended that a formal procedure be developed on how to dispose of electronically stored personal data.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report
Recommendation 9 (Internet Voting) Switzerland 2011
by: OSCE

The practice of printing polling cards should be reviewed to ensure security of sensitive data and protect against possible use of voter credentials by unauthorized individuals.


Recommendation status: recommended

Open full report