USA: Clean and open American elections, The New York Times (2010) —
English
 
Subscribe to ACE Newsletter
These topic pages provide a quick overview and easy access to all content that can be found on ACE for any give topic of interest - weather encyclopaedia files, electoral materials, comparative data, consolidated replies, case studies, or other.

ELECTORAL FRAMEWORK

Legal Framework Boundary Delimitation Electoral Systems

ELECTORAL PARTICIPATION

Gender and Elections Parties and Candidates Disability and Elections Media and Elections Civic and Voter Education Direct Democracy

ELECTORAL MANAGEMENT

Electoral Management Cost of Elections

ELECTORAL INTEGRITY

Electoral Integrity Campaign Finance Measuring Electoral Quality Election Observation Electoral Assistance

ELECTORAL OPERATIONS

Voter Registration Voting Operations Voter Identification Results Management Out of Country Voting Elections and Technology Elections and Security
Countries
Encyclopaedia Electoral Materials Comparative Data Election Calendar Observation Portal BRIDGE Extended Learning Latest Updates
Ask the Experts Consolidated Replies Find An Expert Access ACE Practitioners' Workspace
About ACE The History of ACE Contact ACE ACE Partners Practitioners' Network FAQ
 

USA: Clean and open American elections, The New York Times (2010)

This article discusses the report of the Center for American Progress, a policy group based in Washington, on the role of the United States Chamber of Commerce in the electoral campaign. According to the report, the Chamber would be actively inviting foreign corporations to invest and finance the electoral campaigns for the mid-term elections. The Chamber would receive "dues" payments from foreign companies, and then advocate on their behalf for candidates. The Chamber (who denied all charges) will spend $75 million for the elections, and according to the federal tax code donors can remain anonymous.

The link address is: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/06/opinion/06wed1.html

Document Actions