USA: Groups push limits in advertising, The New York Times (2010) —
English
 
Subscribe to ACE Newsletter
These topic pages provide a quick overview and easy access to all content that can be found on ACE for any give topic of interest - weather encyclopaedia files, electoral materials, comparative data, consolidated replies, case studies, or other.

ELECTORAL FRAMEWORK

Legal Framework Boundary Delimitation Electoral Systems

ELECTORAL PARTICIPATION

Gender and Elections Parties and Candidates Disability and Elections Media and Elections Civic and Voter Education Direct Democracy

ELECTORAL MANAGEMENT

Electoral Management Cost of Elections

ELECTORAL INTEGRITY

Electoral Integrity Campaign Finance Measuring Electoral Quality Election Observation Electoral Assistance

ELECTORAL OPERATIONS

Voter Registration Voting Operations Voter Identification Results Management Out of Country Voting Elections and Technology Elections and Security
Countries
Encyclopaedia Electoral Materials Comparative Data Election Calendar Observation Portal BRIDGE Extended Learning Latest Updates
Ask the Experts Consolidated Replies Find An Expert Access ACE Practitioners' Workspace
About ACE The History of ACE Contact ACE ACE Partners Practitioners' Network FAQ
 

USA: Groups push limits in advertising, The New York Times (2010)

This article reports on the election campaign in the United States. The author discusses the consequences of the Supreme Court ruling about political financing and advertising. The unlimited financial aids from individuals and corporations to non-profit groups must be directed to “issue ads”, that do not “express advocacy” directly. The groups, however, are apparently pushing the legal limits with border-line television ads.

The link address is: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/18/us/politics/18express.html

Document Actions