Publishing lists of people who voted in an election —
English
 

Publishing lists of people who voted in an election

This has been the topic of discussion and the reason for much debate in the ACE Practitioners´ Network. Several members argue that the publication of whether voters voted or not would undermine the secrecy of the vote and it was suggested that international good practice is to not publish the lists, and that this should therefore be discouraged. Indeed The Council of Europe's Code of Good Practice in Electoral Matters, section I.4.54, states that: “since abstention may indicate a political choice, lists of persons voting should not be published." It was suggested that in countries with recent dictatorial history, this could be seen as a tool to control or pressure voters and that in counties with recent history of conflict and intimidation of voters, publishing the list of voters would discourage participation. On the other hand, the point was made that a list of persons who voted does not reflect for whom these persons voted and therefore the secrecy of the vote would not be undermined and one respondent was of the view that the publication of this information should consequently not require a court order. Publishing lists could even be a good way of ensuring targeted outreach efforts and voter education campaigns.

So, should lists be made available to the public? Opinions expressed include:

Yes. They should be treated as public documents and anyone should be allowed to access them, or they should even be published online and/or offline. This information is vital to making the electoral process more transparent, minimizing chances of fraud, and better informing voter education strategies.

Sometimes. They should only be available for scrutiny under specific circumstances, such as after serious allegations of fraud. The decision to publish a list should depend on the likelihood of such information improving a country's electoral process.

Never. They should not be made available under any circumstances. Publishing lists of who voted violates the secrecy of the vote.

Access the full discussion here, including country examples from Canada, Nigeria, Democratic Republic of the Congo, New Zealand, United Kingdom, United States of America, Jamaica, Romania, Switzerland and Burundi.

Should lists with information about who voted and who did not be made available to the public?

  • Yes. They should be treated as public documents and anyone should be allowed to access them.
  • Sometimes. Only under specific circumstances, such as after serious allegations of fraud.
  • Never. Publishing lists of who voted violates the secrecy of the vote.
  • I don’t know.
Total votes
88 people have voted on this poll.
Document Actions

Publishing lists of people who voted in an election

Posted by Lourenco Chiluvane at Mar 26, 2015 05:28 PM
....I Think the position of the Council of Europe's Code of Good Practice in Electoral Matters, section I.4.54,seems to be defending that the list of the voters who not voted should not be published. Personally I was more tending to defend the publication of the list of the voters who voted, because this could be a good tool to solve electoral conflict, specially if the question is, how many voters voted. This is relevant (also) to calculate the mandates in parlament and in case of Mozambique the party mandates in parlament has some financial implications for the polical parties.
So the political circunstances in each political context should be innovative.