Role of EMBs in electoral law reform —
English
 

Role of EMBs in electoral law reform

Electoral reform represents an integral part of democratic development. In broad terms, electoral reforms are undertaken to improve the electoral process by promoting electoral rights of the citizens. Continuous reflection, reform and adaptation of the legal framework governing electoral processes that are based on experiences, reviews and assessments are necessary in old as well as new democracies.

Electoral law reform processes present EMBs with a series of dilemmas. When should they and when should they not engage in such processes? EMBs are first and foremost mandated to manage elections. At the same time, the EMBs sit on valuable information about how electoral laws play out in practice and have an interest in ensuring that an adequate legal framework is put in place to facilitate the organization of elections.

Moreover, if EMBs opt to engage – which principles ought to guide their involvement and how could such principles be integrated into the daily work of the EMB on law reform issues? Considering that electoral law reform processes are both political and technical in nature, how should EMBs manoeuvre in this sphere?

Please find two new case studies on this topic on ACE here: Sierra Leone and South Africa.

 

What – if any – should be the role of an EMB in electoral law reform?

  • Major – It should be able to – inter alia – initiate, propose, draft, advocate and provide input into any part of the reform process.
  • Limited – To benefit from the expertise of the EMB, but not to compromise its independence, the EMBs role should be limited to participation in the consultation process.
  • None – Legal reform is a political process and any involvement beyond implementation will jeopardize the perceived independence of the EMB.
  • It depends – The role of the EMB in legal reform is heavily contingent on the context and history of the country in which it operates. Overall, high trust, low conflict, stable democracies provide a good basis for high involvement by the EMB while low trust, high conflict fragile states do not.
Total votes
400 people have voted on this poll.
Document Actions
Add comment

Your comment will not be approved if it contains inappropriate, inflammatory or offensive language, or if it addresses clearly partisan matters. Please make sure your comment is written in a clear, concise matter. If you would like an answer to your comment, please fill in your email address in the form below. If you have a question rather than a comment, please contact [email protected].

(Required)
Tell us your name.
(Required)
Enter your e-mail address.
(Required)
(Required)