| 3752 recommendations |
Recommendation Recommendation 3 (Capacity Buidling) Nepal 2009
by: The Carter Center
Party representative and poll workers must be better trained with the use of the EVM's. This will not only increase the turn around time of the election results but also increase the validity of the results.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 4 (Vote Counting) Nepal 2009
by: The Carter Center
There is a need for the replacement of the centralized vote counting practice in many areas. This delays the turnaround of the vote and leaves room of error. The EVM's make the idea of ward based counting valid.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 5 (Elections Security) Nepal 2009
by: The Carter Center
all parties must put forth more of an effort to make the election intimidation and harassment free. As agreed in the peace talk no party youth wings or militias should influence the electoral process.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation recommendation 1 (Legal Framework) Lebanon 2009
by: The Carter Center
First the delineation of who can vote and where they can vote is a issue in Lebanon. Especially with a single day of voting it is hard for some to access the polls. The lebanonese must also developed a standard ballot to be used in election. The current party provided ballot system encourages fraud and limits secrecy Also there are unnecessary restrictions on who has the ability to vote. Restriction against active security personal and naturalized citizen should be reconsidered. contingencies should be developed for increasing accessibility to the polls for those who are hospitalized. A Major observation made by the Carter Center is that Confessional system that is present in Lebanon severely limits the ability for all Lebanonese citizens to run for office. out of 128 seat in parliament 11 are reserved for minorities. The last majorly disenfranchised group is non residential Lebanonese. A better absentee voter system should be developed.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation recommendation 2 (Electoral Management) Lebanon 2009
by: The Carter Center
The preparation and training of poll workers in Lebanon was good. The Ministry of the Interior and Municipalities (MOIM) printed workbooks of guidelines for every poll worker and established a hotline for anyone who might have had any questions. Both of these initiatives were very successful. the only major inconsistency came from the printing and distribution of voter ID cards. There various problems with the registration and finger printing system. Also they were used as scapegoat for calls of foul play on election day as claims of fake ID's surfaced
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation recommendation 3 (Voting Operations) Lebanon 2009
by: The Carter Center
In general the day of voting procedures went quite smoothly but the observers saw inconsistencies that raised alarm. First organization at the polls was a problem. There was only allowed as many people in the polling station as there were polls there this cause extremely long lines and tension. Contributing to the long wait was the lack of organization surrounding the distribution of the voter materials. Observers noted that another cause of delays was the fact that many poll workers were picked form a pool of candidate representative. These peoples loyalty to their candidate overshadowed their duty to run a orderly poll. These delay deterred many including the disable from voting. The security on the voting day discouraged most overt forms of voter intimidation but party officers and candidate reps. station inside the 50 meter no campaigning zone was found to intimidate many voters.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation recommendation 4 (Vote Counting) Lebanon 2009
by: The Carter Center
The Carter Center Observers noticed that the counting of votes need to be adapted. The procedure for counting was not always followed. This cause a delay in the relapse of the results.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation recommendation 5 (Parties and Candidates) Lebanon 2009
by: The Carter Center
Even thought for the most part the campaign portion of the election was peaceful their were report of partisan street fights, burning opponent paraphernalia, and aggressive protesting. The big success and concern in this section is the campaign financing. This election was the first in Lebanon where the finance was regulated. The problem was that law of private bank and corporate protection hindered the Supervisory Commission on the Electoral Campaign (SCEC)ability to successfully regulate the candidates campaigns.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation recommendation 6 (Media) Lebanon 2009
by: The Carter Center
In the time leading up to the election in Lebanon media services in the country had become extremely politicized. Most of the observed messages divisions were based on religious and ethnic differences. The SCEC (Lebanese media monitoring agency) is responsible for regulating the electoral propaganda. The observers recommend that the SCEC is given greater control to regulate private media sources to adhere to regulations such as the media blackout that is administer 24 hour prior to the opening of the polls.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation recommendation 7 (Voter Registration) Lebanon 2009
by: The Carter Center
The registration system in Lebanon needs to be brought up to date through the digitations of the public records. This would cut out the approximately 40,000 double entries. Another systematic cause of inconsistencies in the Lebanese voter registration is that voter are not registered to their current address. Instead they are connected to the their ancestral home. This doesn't take into consideration natural demographic changes over time.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation recommendation 8 (Voter Education) Lebanon 2009
by: The Carter Center
Voter education was observe red as wide spread. Women were targeted as a group that needed to be engaged. The UNDP held 30 panels targeted towards educating female voters.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation recommendation 9 (Electoral Dispute Resolution) Lebanon 2009
by: The Carter Center
There are various shortcoming to the Parliamentary Electoral Law that do not cover the resolution of election disputes. First there is no way to file a complaint on the day on of polling. Also the majority of complaints were filed to the SCEC with mandated is to regulate media which limit its ability to address most disputes. Also since the Constitutional Council is the only body that can rule on such disputes the Lebanese government must do a better job of nominating judges in a timely manner.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation recommendation 1 (Parties and Candidates) China 2010
by: The Carter Center
Observers were unable to se how candidate were being selected. 24 people sign up to run for office but only two ran.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation recommendation 2 (Campaign Environment) China 2010
by: The Carter Center
The Candidate speeches gave the people little to vote off on. The question and answer portion was limited to two questions each.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation recommendation 3 (Voting Operations) China 2010
by: The Carter Center
The voting system lacked the basic organization part such a a line of private voting booth. Also the ballot itself was confusing with a unnecessary for and against box.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation recommendation 4 (Electoral Integrity and Dispute Resolution) China 2010
by: The Carter Center
The electoral system is heavily tilted toward the incumbent.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation To the Philippine Government (Legal Framework) Philippines 2010
by: The Carter Center
The Electoral legal framework of the Philippines is based on a legal code from 1985. But since it has be amended by republic acts because parts of it have been deemed out dated. In addition to this document the COMELEC (Committee of elections) has made mandates for the running of elections that are not associated with the original legal code.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation To the COMELEC (Electoral Management) Philippines 2010
by: The Carter Center
The Carter Center observers reported to several recommendations the COMELEC first of which more must be invested in the training of the local poll worker or (BMI) I trained fully on the automated election system. Second In past elections the deadline and schedule of election was so abrupt that it forced the rushing of the electoral process. The observers advise the COMELEC creates a more realistic election schedule. Also the observers felt the real world pre election testing should have been schedule earlier so that the COMELEC would have sufficient time to make the necessary adjustments. Secrecy of the ballot which is one of the key aspects of a free and fair election was not observed in this election. Observers felt as though there was a need for allot more polling stations. Last the COMELEC should adapt their procedures in order to make them more realistic and cost effective.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation To the Candidates and Parties (Voting Operations) Philippines 2010
by: The Carter Center
The Candidates and parties should be incorporate into the pre election test of the AES system this would create a lot more public trust in this system.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 1 (Legal Framework) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
"Sudan needs to remove the legal ""inconsistencies and contradictions"" that block the Sudanese people from freely electing their government. Regulations and laws that do not align with the Sudanese constitution or various international agreements the government has signed on must be removed."
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 2 (Boundary Delimitation) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
The sensitivity of the subject enhances the need to establish voter districts early. Also the process by which districts are created must be made a unique methodology. The reports of the delineation must be more detailed and include maps and various demographics.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 3 (Electoral Dispute Resolution) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
The legal framework that governs electoral disputes needs to be augmented so that is can be more accessible to all citizens. Observers advise that criminal procedure is spirited from dispute resolution.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 4 (Elections Security) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
The Comprehensive Peace Agreement included the creation of an agency to monitor human rights grievances during the election. But at the time of the election the agency had not been created. The creation of this agency would be a good step in the direction of free elections.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 5 (Elections Security) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
The center's Observers believe to improve the security for both before during and after the election there must be effective constant and clear communication between the various political parties the Sudanese government, and the South Sudanese Government. Also a general respect for human rights must be constantly observed.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 6 (Minorities) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
It is advised that the Sudanese government must reach out to the Saurian people and come to some accord to bring about the integration of the rebels in to the Sudanese election.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 7 (Minority and Refugee Voting) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
More must be done to engage certain special populations in Sudan. Internally displaced people, nomads, pastoral because of their lack of a perm ant residence need to be paid special attention. The Observers advise the creation of a vote ID to help ensure their access to the polls
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 8 (Voter Education) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
The observers advise that the government invest a lot in to the educating of illiterate voters. Also more time should put into the teaching the citizenry about political and party images.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 9 (Parties and Candidates) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
The NEC should encourage the parties to come together and create an effective code of conduct to govern their followers actions during campaign season.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 10 (Campaign Environment) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
The Sudanese government should impose a cap on party spending on campaigns. The existing rules that prohibit incumbents from use government money to win campaigns should also be enforced.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 11 (Parties and Candidates) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
Representatives of the government should be trained better and given much more technical support. A
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 12 (Electoral Observation) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
The accreditation of domestic observers must be simplified down to a specific process. They should receive much more extensive observation training. Also they must remove unnecessary restrictions that limit the observers ability to do their jobs. Last they should broaden their focus outside of the polling day to the entire electoral process.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 14 (Media) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
First the government owned or affiliated media outlets should be restricted from publishing and reporting biased information on various parties or candidates. The government with the media outlet should agree on a new media code to regulate how the media should responsibly participate in the electoral process.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 15 (Electoral Calendar) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
The Electoral Time needs to made earlier and must be more flexible.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 16 (Voter Registration) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
Observers advise that a Voter ID be issues broadly to all citizens after the registration is completed. The voter roll must be translated in to both Arabic and English so that it can be accessible to all stakeholders. Steps should be take to ensure that registration slip cannot be purchased in mass by parties. This weakens the credibility of the overall election.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 17 (Parties and Candidates) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
The nomination process should be changed so that all citizens have the opportunity to run for political office. Changes in registration fee's would be the most effective method.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 18 (Campaign Environment) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
The Sudanese Government should organize the process by which parties can request the time a place to have a rally or demonstration. These new process should not limit the ability for candidate to campaign
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 19 (Electoral Management) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
The agreed procedures and process that will govern the running of the election must be agreed upon earlier. Also communication between the NEC and HEC must be improved.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 20 (Independence of Electoral Authorities) (Electoral Management) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
Neutrality is a must for all electoral workers. The NEC needs to do a better jobs making sure that its affiliates are not following their political leanings. A code of conduct should be developed and enforced.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 21 (Staffing, Skills, and Training) (Electoral Management) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
The head of the Electoral Management Bodies must be a full time permanent employee. The EMB it self must be have the funds to fully train all of its affiliates or employees
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 22 (Centralized Data Entry) (Electoral Management) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
Instead of the local based vote counting systems that was used in this election there should a more centralized. The observers advise that they be housed in Khartoum and Juba.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 23 (Accountability and Security of Ballots) (Electoral Management) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
In order to improve the security of the ballot and the timeliness of their delivery the ballot production should be centralized and do abroad. To increase the public confidence in the ballot party members government officials and observers should watch over the printing process.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 24 (Disbursement of Funds and Payment of Staff) (Electoral Management) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
The NEC must ensure the timely disbursement of funds to state and local offices. The untimely paying of officials opens the possibility of corruption.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 25 Training of Registration and Polling Staff) (Electoral Management) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
To echo earlier recommendation polling station, National and local staff must receive extensive training.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation 26 (Distribution of Polling center ) (Electoral Management) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
Polling station must better staffed. Also the location of the polling stations must better promoted.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Recommendation (27 Polling) (Voting Operations) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
The procedures of polling day must be updated. The overnight storage of ballots must be improved. There must be a standard procedure by which all voters can go through when they enter a polling station. Also the wait time must be decreased. Last there must also a standard method by which the voter and report a complaint.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation (counting) (Vote Counting) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
Counters should how to determine valid from an invalid votes. Also an adequate battery powered light source should be attached to the vote counting kit
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Tabulation process (Vote Tabulation) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
The tabulation should be made more transparent so to increase the confidence of the population in the electoral process. Members form various parties and the government should be at the site to approve of the voting tabulation results. The tabulation data software must be updated so that it is up-to-date with international standards.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation releasing results (Results) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
The Release of results must be done by the polling station first. This gives the people observers and parties the ability verify the total results
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Government cooperation (Elections Security) Sudan 2010
by: The Carter Center
It is the responsibility of both The Government of Sudan and South Sudan must ensure that voter will not intimidated. They must come together to develop methods by which security can be enforced. Also the National Intelligence and Security Service should have not party in the electoral process.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|
Recommendation Put in place a credible, efficient, and nonpartisan electoral management body. (Legal Framework) Guinea 2010
by: The Carter Center
The CENI ( the electoral governing body in Guinea) must be more impartial and less paralyzed by political infighting. The Observers recommend that the CENI becomes a smaller more directed institution. The legal framework that constitutes the body must shield the CENI from pressure from the major political parties and the government.
Recommendation status: recommended
Open full report
|