Consolidated Response on Gender Quotas in African Countries
Consolidated Response on Gender Quotas in African Countries
Mikael Fridell, April 07. 2009What are some strategies and legislations in African countries that call for the 30% quota?
Have any of the quotes been adopted in national constitutions?
Re: CONSOLIDATED RESPONSE ON GENDER QUOTAS IN AFRICAN COUNTRIES
Mikael Fridell, April 07. 2009Introduction
The implementation of gender quotas has been part of the political agenda in Africa since the early 1990s. Rumbidzai Kandawasvika-Nhundu, iKNOW Politics Expert and Senior Programme Officer at International IDEA, points out that
“The “critical minority” of at least 30% is commonly considered necessary for women to have a significant impact in positions of power and decision making as conduits for democratic governance.” - (Kandawasvika-Nhundu, R. Expert Opinion. 2009)
Many African countries have successfully implemented both voluntary and mandatory quotas in their legal systems and party platforms. Voluntary quotas are usually adopted by political parties, while mandatory quotas are legislated by governments through national constitutions, electoral codes and other election regulation laws. Currently in Africa, including in North Africa, 6 countries have constitutional quotas for elections to the National Parliament, 19 countries have voluntary party quotas, and 3 countries have reserved seat quotas. (Quota Project. 2006.) Julie Ballington, iKNOW Politics Expert and Program Officer at the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) notes that the regional average of women in parliament currently stands at 18%, which is slightly lower than the global average of 18.6%. Ms. Ballington further mentions that Africa trails the Americas (21.7%), Europe (21.2%), and Asia (18.3%) in terms of women’s access to parliaments, but performs better than the Pacific (13%) and the Arab States (9.7%). (Ballington, J. Expert Opinion. 2009)
This consolidated response highlights various types of quotas adopted in African countries and provides details on the implementation of quotas under different electoral systems. The response also includes several annexes with data on quotas based on country and on quota type.
Quotas in Different Electoral Systems
Existing electoral systems are commonly divided into proportional representation (PR), majority/plurality, and mixed representation systems. There are different forms and sub-systems that exist within the majority/plurality system, among which the First Past the Post (FPTP), Block Vote (BV), Party Block Vote (PBV), Alternative Vote (AV), and Two-Round (TR) systems are implemented most often.
I. Quotas in Majority/Plurality and Mixed Electoral Systems
Research on the practical application of quotas shows that it is easier to implement quotas in countries with a proportional representation (PR) electoral system rather than in countries with majoritarian systems. According to International IDEA’s database, the majority/plurality electoral systems in Africa exist in Botswana, Cameroon, Chad, Cote d’Ivoire, Gabon, Ghana, Gambia, Chad, Ethiopia, Kenya, Liberia, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique, Mauritius, Nigeria, Sudan Swaziland, the Republic of Congo (Brazzaville), the United Republic of Tanzania, Uganda and Zimbabwe. (Table of Electoral Systems Worldwide. 2005) Julie Ballington points out that the average representation of women in the 22 countries using majority/plurality electoral systems stands at 15.5% compared to 27.4% in the 12 countries using proportional representation. Countries with mixed electoral systems have the lowest representation of women, at 13%. For instance, one of the participants of the iKNOW Politics E-Discussion Forum on Gender Quotas as a Mechanism Promoting Women in Politics mentioned that:
“The mainly majoritarian electoral system in Mauritania does not facilitate women’s access to electoral functions. Therefore, women candidates have to be placed at strategic points in their lists (1st or 2nd, 6th, 11th , etc..) in order to be sure to be elected. Proportional electoral systems are in general more suitable to guarantee an easier access to the legislative posts for women.” – (Pellizzeri, A. Governance Programme Officer, UNDP Mauritania. Comment on iKNOW Politics. 2008)
A successful example of quotas
implemented in a majoritarian electoral system is the United Republic
of Tanzania. In Tanzania, the Constitution was amended to raise the
number of special seats reserved for women in the National Assembly to
30%. Additionally, the Constitution requires reserving for women two of
the five seats set aside for candidates from Zanzibar, and five out of
ten seats set aside for presidential appointees. According to the
statistics provided by IPU, after the December 2005 elections, the
National Assembly of Tanzania has 30.4% of women parliamentarians.
(Women in National Parliaments: World Classification. 2008).
Commenting on this achievement, IPU highlighted that as of 2005
Tanzania had the highest percentage of women ever represented in a
majoritarian electoral system. (Women in Parliament in 2005: the Year
in Perspective. p. 1. 2005.)
II. Quotas in Proportional Representation
Implementing quotas in proportional representation systems has proven to be very successful. According to the data provided by the Quota Project, among the countries in Africa that implemented some type of quotas, 12 countries have a proportional representation system. For more details, please see Annex IV. Proportional representation systems make it easier for political parties to implement quotas, especially voluntary quotas. International IDEA has found that rather than having to look for a single candidate who can appeal to a broad range of voters, parties in proportional systems are more inclined to consider candidates with ties and appeal to different groups and different sectors of society to help attract more voters to their party. Conversely, parties may be afraid to lose some of their voter base if they fail to provide some balance by nominating only men. The political costs for nominating a woman candidate would be lower in proportional representation systems because the party would have several slots from which it could find room to do so. (The Effect of Electoral Systems on Women’s Representation. International IDEA.)
Some researchers argue that the best results in gender equality in politics are achieved when a legislated quota is adopted in a proportional representation system. Namibia at the local government level, for example, combines a legislated quota, a voluntary party quota and a proportional representation (PR) system which has resulted in a very impressive 43.8% of women in local government. (Kethusegile-Juru, B. Implementation of Quotas: African Experiences. p.24. 2004.) Furthermore, Colleen Lowe Morna suggests the following:
“Short of changing to a PR system, countries with a constituency system could look at the option pursued by Tanzania of reserving seats for women via a constitutional or legislated quota to be distributed among parties on a PR basis. Mixed systems, such as the one in Tanzania, and local government in South Africa raise the possibility of the PR system becoming a way for women to enter politics and then to contest constituency elections.” - (Morna, C. p8. 2003.)
Constitutional and Legislated Quotas
According to the Quota Project, Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, Somalia, the United Republic of Tanzania, and Uganda have constitutional quotas for National Parliaments. Among these countries, Burundi, Rwanda and the United Republic of Tanzania call for 30 % quotas for women in Parliaments. In Burundi, the Constitution adopted in February 2005 includes Article 164 and Article 129 that envisions quotas for women in parliament and government. Article 164 calls for a 30% quota for women in parliament and, if the quota is not met, the article requires women to be included to the parliament through the cooptation process as specified in the Electoral Code of Burundi. Additionally, Article 129 of the Constitution of Burundi requires that 30 percent of ministerial positions, independent of ethnicity, be allocated to women. (Minority Protections: Executive Branch Mechanisms. p5. 2006.) Julie Ballington, iKNOW Politics Expert and Program Officer at IPU, mentions:
“It is important to note that most quota legislation does not originate at the level of the constitution – in fact it is usually extremely difficult and politically sensitive to amend a constitution to include a quota provision. In many other countries, quotas have been adopted by amending the electoral and political party legislation and this is usually a more expedient way of legislating quotas.” (Ballington, J. Expert Opinion. 2009.)
Several African countries revised their electoral and party laws instead of amending their constitutions to require quotas or reserved seats for women. Out of 11 African countries that require quotas in their election laws or codes, 6 countries have only that type of legislated quota, while the rest of the countries have both election law and constitutional quotas. This type of legislated quota is as compulsory as the constitutional quotas, with an exception that constitutional quotas are usually more difficult to remove. (Dahlerup, D. Expert Opinion. 2009.) For instance, Article 20 of the Political Parties Law in Angola mandates that political party charters include rules encouraging gender equality and requiring at least 30% representation of women. For more information, please see Annex II.
In some countries, even if the constitution calls for a 30% quota for women, the number of women in parliaments and decision-making positions may be higher. An excellent example of reaching over the established quota is Rwanda, where Article 9 of the Constitution commits the government of Rwanda to set aside 30% of posts in decision-making bodies to women candidates and Article 82 reserves 30% of seats to women in the Senate. (Quota Project. 2009) The introduction of the quota allowed Rwanda to have the highest number of women parliamentarians in the world with women constituting 48.8% in the Lower House and 30 % in the Senate after the 2003 elections, and with 56.3% of women parliamentarians elected in the Lower House and 34.6% in the Senate after the 2008 elections. (Women in Parliaments: World Classification. IPU)
Voluntary Quotas
Voluntary quotas are quotas adopted by political parties on a voluntary basis. In many cases, quotas are first implemented by parties that have equality as a major policy focus, and then other parties follow the lead. In many cases, political parties adopt voluntary quotas under pressure from women’s groups and organizations, and women members of their parties.
As shown in Annex III, about 19 countries in Africa have political party quotas, with most of the parties adopting between 25%-30% voluntary quotas. The highest voluntary quota of 50% was introduced by the Congress of Democrats (CoD) and South West Africa People's Organization (SWAPO) in Namibia, and the Movement for Progress Party (MOP) in Sierra-Leone.
The success of voluntary party quotas may vary from country to country, being less effective in the countries with majority/plurality electoral systems. According to Bookie Kethusegile-Juru, the ‘zebra stripe’ system for the selection of candidates (alternating male and female candidates) has never translated into reality and been effectively implemented in the constituency based electoral systems in Africa. Ms. Bookie Kethusegile-Juru mentions that despite the existence of voluntary party quotas in Zimbabwe and Botswana the quotas for women have not been filled and women’s representation in these countries stands very low. (Implementation of Quotas: African Experiences. p.24. 2004.) Speaking about African experiences in adopting voluntary quotas, Rumbidzai A Kandawasvika-Nhundu, iKNOW Politics Expert and Senior Programme Officer at International IDEA), indicates that:
“Generally, there has been greater reliance on legislated or constitutional quotas rather than reliance on political party compliance or initiative. This is due to the fact that where parties have quotas they do not always abide by them.”
This illustrates that voluntary quotas depend on the strong will and commitment of the party leadership to promote women in politics. Therefore, it is crucial that women party members and women’s organizations constantly work with party leaders to ensure their commitment by actively recruiting women to their party membership, seeking the nomination of women candidates in their election lists, and promoting women within their party machinery.
Voluntary Party Quota: Case of the African National Congress (ANC)
“To date, the African National Congress (ANC) is the only party in South Africa to have introduced a quota to ensure the representation of women in politics and decision-making. This system was introduced before the first general election for a democratic South Africa in 1994.
In the democratic elections of 1994, one-third of the public representatives elected by the ANC to the national and provincial legislatures were women. As a result, 25 percent of the members of the National Assembly were women. This was a great leap forward, as prior to 1994, South Africa had never had more than 4 percent representation of women in parliament. This placed South Africa among the top ten countries in the world in regard to the participation of women in parliament.
The ANC government went ahead and appointed women as ministers and deputy ministers. In parliament, women became presiding officers, advisers, whips and committee chairpersons. The 1999 elections witnessed the increasing presence of women in political decision-making. Unlike in 1994, when the ANC had to use the quota system to place women on its lists for the national and provincial legislatures, in 1999, the list for the national parliament did not have to be altered to achieve one-third representation – women were placed in every third position on the national list. Thus, the ANC list process resulted in the achievement of 33 percent representation of women. Women in South African politics became more visible.”
Authored by Mavivi Myakayaka-Manzini.
Derived from Implementation of Quotas: African Experiences. 2004. http://www.idea.int/publications/quotas_africa/upload/IDEA_no3.qxd.pdf
Conclusion:
In recent years, countries in Africa have made significant progress in promoting women in politics and public life. A number of African countries have set a 30% quota for women to create a critical mass of women leaders and empower women to have a substantial impact in public life. The best results were achieved in the countries that implemented some type of quota such as voluntary or legislative or a combination of both. Some countries in Africa, such as Rwanda with 56.3% and Angola with 37.3% of women in parliament, have surpassed the 30% quota. Research shows that the success of quotas mostly depends on the type of electoral system in a country, commitment of party leaders and governments to promote women in politics, and activeness of women’s movements and groups. Research shows that a proportional representation electoral system has been the most conducive to fulfilling quotas and promoting women in politics in Africa. See the annex below for more detailed country-by-country information.
The full version of consolidate response together with the Annexes is to be found at
iKNOW Politics web pages.
Further Reading:
1. Ballington, J. Expert Opinion: Implementing Quotas in Africa. iKNOW Politics. 2009. http://www.iknowpolitics.org/en/node/8821
2. Constitution of Burundi in French. Senat of Burundi. 2005. http://www.senat.bi/documents/constitution_bdi_francais.pdf
3. Dahlerup, Drude. Expert Opinion: Quotas in African Countries. iKNOW Politics. 2009. http://www.iknowpolitics.org/en/node/9291
4. Kandawasvika-Nhundu, Rumbidzai. Expert Opinion: Strategies and Legislation Adopted in Africa that Call for the 30% Quota. http://www.iknowpolitics.org/en/node/9289
5. Kethusegile-Juru, Bookie. Implementation of Quotas: African Experiences. International IDEA. 2004. http://www.idea.int/publications/quotas_africa/upload/IDEA_no3.qxd.pdf
6. Minority Protections: Executive Branch Mechanisms. 2006. The Public International Law & Policy Group (PILPG). www.publicinternationallaw.org/areas/peacebuilding/PILPGMinorityExecutiveBranchMechanisms8.21.06.doc
7. Morna, Colleen Lowe. “Beyond Numbers – Quotas in practice.”. International IDEA. 2003. http://www.quotaproject.org/CS/CS_Lowe Morna-1-6-2004.pdf
8. Quota Project: Burundi. Quota Project. 2006. http://quotaproject.org/displayCountry.cfm?CountryCode=BI
9. Quota Project: Rwanda. Quota Project. 2009. http://quotaproject.org/displayCountry.cfm?CountryCode=RW
10. Summary from the E-Discussion Forum on Gender Quotas as a Mechanism Promoting Women in Politics. iKNOW Politics. 2008. http://www.iknowpolitics.org/en/node/6276
11. Table of Electoral Systems Worldwide. International IDEA. 2005. http://www.idea.int/esd/world.cfm
12. The Effect of Electoral Systems on Women’s Representation. International IDEA http://archive.idea.int/women/parl/ch3c.htm
13. Women in National Parliaments: World Classification. Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU). 2008. http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htm
14. Women in parliament in 2005: the year in perspective. Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU). 2005. http://www.ipu.org/pdf/publications/women06_en.pdf
15. Women in National Parliaments: World Classification. http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htm