Assessing EMB Performance
Like all public and corporate bodies whose policies and practices affect the public, the EMB is required to periodically account to its various stakeholders on its performance, including the way it uses public funds. Accountability means that the EMB is responsible for its activities, and must periodically provide evidence to its stakeholders and the public that its activities are effective and meet its prescribed legal, ethical, service, and financial standards. The principle of accountability requires that the EMB provide comprehensive public information on its policies, their intended outcomes, its performance, and the resources it has used and intends to use, including public and other funds.
EMBs are accountable for the development of policy decisions to give effect to their mandate, and for how they implement those decisions. They are accountable for electoral administration and how that administration functions, and they are accountable for their compliance with all relevant laws and regulations. Most importantly, they are accountable for delivering good-quality electoral services to voters and other stakeholders.
Accountability has a number of positive effects on the structure and operations of the EMB. It aids the transparency of the EMB in its performance, funding, and expenditures. Sometimes the lack of proper accountability mechanisms leads to accusation of poor operational transparency. Accountability positively influences the general public perception about the EMB’s independence, good governance, and non-partisanship and assists the EMB to gain the confidence of the public and important stakeholders, particularly political parties and government ministries.
To meet internal and external accountability requirements, an EMB needs mechanisms that can assess its activities, and assure itself and its stakeholders of the quality, effectiveness and probity of its operational and financial management. These mechanisms include:
- audits;
- internal quality controls;
- evaluations;
- post-election reviews;
- peer reviews; and
- external oversight.
Previous

